Legal Opinion

Loehr v. Latham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Sixteenth District. Action for slander. Motion to change place of trial.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

This action was brought in Amador county. The defendant alleges in his answer, which is verified, that he was, at the commencement of the action, and still is, a resident of Sacramento county, and insists that the trial of the action shall be in that county. Upon the answer, and his affidavit of residence in Sacramento county, the defendant moved the Court to change the place of trial. The plaintiff resisted the motion by affidavit that he had a’ large number of witnesses, and that they all reside in Amador county, and that a removal of the case to Sacramento would work injury to him and…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stocks v. StocksNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. San Jose Hospital v. EthertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Jenkins v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Sheffield v. Pickwick StagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API