Legal Opinion
Van v. LLR, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 12, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00197Unknown
1Opinion
WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA KATIE VAN, individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LLR, INC., d/b/a LuLaRoe, and LULAROE, ) LLC, ) ) No. 3:18-cv-0197-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Dismiss Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff’s UTPCPA claim.1 This motion is opposed.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background Plaintiff is Katie Van. Defendants are LLR, Inc., d/b/a LuLaRoe, and LuLaRoe, LLC. “LuLaRoe is a multilevel-marketing company…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- D. Neubronner v. Michael R. MilkenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.