Legal Opinion

Jefress v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; D. A. Richardson, Judge. Action by George H. Phillips against J. L. Jefress and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Jefress brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On January 25, 1909, George H. Phillips, ■defendant in error, sued J. E. Jefress and John Duran, plaintiffs in error, and R. L. Boyd, in the district court of Pontotoc county on their two certain promissory notes, each for $300, or in all for $711.30, including interest and attorney fees. After judgment by default against Duran and the cause was dismissed as to Boyd, and Jefress had answered setting up fraud in the execution of the notes and an offer to rescind, there was a reply and trial to a jury. At the close of all the evidence, plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s evidence was sustained,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gilpin v. Netograph MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. J. Crouch & Son v. HuberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Noble v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Dozier v. NorthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API