Legal Opinion
Felts v. CLK Management, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 2011No. 30,142, 29,702PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} The opinion filed in this case on March 2, 2011, is hereby withdrawn, and the following opinion is filed in its place. The motions for rehearing filed by Defendants are denied.
{2} In this consolidated case, Defendants CLK Management, Inc.(CLK) and Cash Advance Network, Inc. (CANI) (collectively, Defendants) appeal the district court’s denial of their respective motions to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings pursuant to a binding arbitration provision located within three payday-type loan agreements that Plaintiff Andrea J. Felts entered into with Defendants over…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hill v. Wackenhut Services InternationalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clay v. New Mexico Title Loans, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ruppelt v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, L.L.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gabriel v. Island Pacific Academy, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Luginbuhl v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.