Legal Opinion

Yamada v. Kuramoto

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 7, 2010No. Civil 10-00497 JMS/LEKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ONLY AS TO ACT 211 § 11-KK)

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), the Supreme Court invalidated limitations on the amount of corporate independent campaign expenditures. Such restrictions violate the First Amendment. In the wake of Citizens United, Plaintiffs Jimmy Yamada (“Yamada”), Russell Stewart (“Stewart”), and A-l A-Electrician, Inc. (“A-l”) filed this action on August 27, 2010,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jimmy Yamada v. William SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Yamada v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  3. Fonseca v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center RosevilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API