Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council Action v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 9, 2006No. Civil 03-613-KIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, Judge.
Plaintiffs Oregon Natural Resources Council Action, Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund, American Lands Alliance, BARK, and Cascadia Wildlands Project (collectively “ONRC”) filed suit in May 2003, claiming that the Forest Service failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) in offering and awarding six timber sales. I granted ONRC’s motion for summary judgment in October 2003, Or. Natural Res. Council Action v. United States Forest Serv., 293 F.Supp.2d 1200, 1210 (D.Or.2003), and enjoined further logging “pending a decision by the agency…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. SaboDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Zip-O-Log Mills, Inc., D/B/a, Zip-O Timber Co. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Oregon Wild v. Constance CumminsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.