Legal Opinion
Oregon Wild v. Constance Cummins
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 8, 2017No. Case No. 1:15-cv-01360-CLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER, MARK D. CLARKE, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs Oregon Wild, Friends of Living Oregon Waters, and Western Watersheds Project (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit against Defendants Constance Cummins, the United-States Forest Service,' Laurie R. -Sada, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively, “Defendants”). Ed Garrett Ranch, Inc.; Philip Grohs; Matt Owens; Adam Owens; Kness Cattle, Inc.; Steve Simmons; Holiday Ranches, Inc.; and C & A Vogt Community Property Trust (collectively, “Intervenor-Defendants”) timely intervened. Plaintiffs .allege…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Triumvirate, LLC v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Friends of Bitterroot v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020