Beal v. Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
In this diversity suit for personal injuries, the plaintiff has served interrogatories upon the defendant requesting it to disclose the names of its liability insurers and the limits of their policies. The defendant objected, and plaintiff moved to compel the answers. In our opinion, the motion should be denied and the objections sustained.
The courts are not in agreement on this subject. Rule 26(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., which is entitled to liberal interpretation, provides for discovery of testimony “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- McClure v. BoegerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cook v. WeltyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Slomberg v. PennabakerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Hillman v. PennyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James G. Thomas, Jr., Brother and Next of Kin of Karen G. Thomas v. Elizabeth Oldfield, M.D.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Sawyer v. BouffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Helms v. Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- James G. Thomas, Jr., Brother and Next of Kin of Karen G. Thomas v. Elizabeth Oldfield, M.D.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009