Legal Opinion
Helms v. Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike Authority
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 3, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 185-70-RPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
The above styled action involves an accident which occurred on the Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike. The plaintiff, while walking along the shoulder of Interstate 95, was struck by a truck fitted with a snowplow blade, owned by the defendant Authority, and driven by defendant Roberts. As a result of the accident both of plaintiff’s legs were amputated.
The plaintiff now seeks to discover the existence and contents of any insur*531anee agreements which may be of benefit to the defendants, citing as authority Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b) and 33, 28 U.S.C. The defendants contest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- H F G Co. v. Pioneer Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Gallimore v. DyeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
- Hillman v. PennyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Landkammer v. O'LaughlinDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Beal v. Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- River v. Richmond Metropolitan AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- Sawyer v. BouffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Miles v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001