Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Penny

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 11, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 3762PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, District Judge.

This is a suit for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. The plaintiff has filed a motion to require the defendant to disclose the facts with regard to any automobile liability insurance held by the defendant. This information is sought as a part of the discov*160ery authorized under the provisions of Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. In substance this rule permits discovery of any matter, not privileged, which is “relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.” The rule goes further to provide that discovery…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Brooks v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  4. Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Orgel v. McCurdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit & Leasing Corp. of P.R., Inc. v. Concessionaires, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  2. Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rosenberger v. VallejoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Bisserier v. ManningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
  5. Sawyer v. BouffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API