Legal Opinion

Hartwig v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The appellant contends that the court erred in its finding of fact that there is no testimony that the key to the safety-deposit box or the certificates of deposit or the bankbooks were ever delivered to petitioner (appellant) or to anybody for her during the lifetime of decedent, and in its finding that the greater weight of the evidente does not indicate that there was ever any delivery made in order to effect a gift causa mortis or otherwise, and in its holding that the undisputed testimony did not show a .sufficient delivery as a matter of law to constitute a completed gift. It is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Opitz v. KarelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Foley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wing v. MerchantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of NolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Estate of Detjen v. FriedmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Guardianship of CoolidgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lawrence v. Children's Home & Aid SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Clark v. O'NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API