Legal Opinion

Estate of Nols

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.

Two questions are raised: (1) Did the county court have jurisdiction to determine whether there had been a valid gift causa mortis? (2) Was there such a gift?

The appellant Will relies upon several cases beginning with Saddington’s Estate v. Hewitt (1887), 70 Wis. 240, 35 N. W. 552. In that case Saddington’s estate was in probate and a petition was filed under the section now numbered sec. 312.06, 'Stats., claiming that assets of the estate were concealed and wrongfully withheld from those entitled to receive them by a stranger to the proceedings. This court said that section provided solely…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Saddington's Estate v. HewittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Estate of Horkan v. CroalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schad v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  2. Lore v. HabermeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Matter of Estate of RuedigerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Matter of Estate of CoreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API