In re M.W.

¶1 The Youth Court of the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, required then-juvenile M.W. to register as a sexual offender. The case was subsequently transferred to District Court, which later denied M.W.’s petition to be relieved of the registration requirement. M.W. appeals the denial of his petition. We affirm.

¶2 Did the District Court err by denying M. W. ’s petition to relieve him from the requirement to register as a sexual offender ?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 In June 2007, the State filed a petition in Youth Court alleging M.W. was a delinquent youth. M.W.…