Legal Opinion
State v. Courville
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 2002No. 00-800PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Appellant Matthew Courville (Courville), appeals an order of the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, denying his motion to suppress and motion for a new trial. We affirm.
¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Did the District Court properly deny Courville’s motion to suppress evidence?
¶4 2. Did the District Court properly instruct the jury regarding the statutory prohibition against the use of force to resist arrest?
¶5 We do not address the final issue presented by Courville, whether his sentence enhancement under § 46-18-221, MCA, for use of a weapon is valid under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CybulskiMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McCaslinMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DunfeeMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Adams v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.