Moyer v. United Dominion Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are five factory workers who allege serious and permanent hand injuries after years of using defendant’s swager, a machine used to form metal. Plaintiffs claim that the swager was defectively designed because it emitted excessive vibration, and that the defendant failed to warn them of the vibration risk.
Before trial, and in accordance with Pennsylvania law, the District Court conducted a risk-utility analysis and determined, as a threshold matter, that the swager was “unreasonably dangerous.” After a two-week jury trial on the design…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spowal v. ITW Food Equipment Group LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- CHISLER v. JohnstonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Fattman v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. DetelichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In re: Skye Mineral Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.