Legal Opinion

Fattman v. Bear

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 10, 2007No. 06-2951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a post-trial motion for a new trial on damages, or in the alternative, motion for a new trial on liability and damages, challenging the exclusion of Patricia Fattman’s direct testimony on post-accident employment accommodations. We will affirm.

I

Plaintiffs Patricia Fattman and her husband Lewis Fattman brought suit to recover damages sustained in a motor vehicle accident with a vehicle driven by Defendant John Bear. A jury returned a verdict for Plaintiffs and awarded $25,000 to Patricia Fattman but none for Lewis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornelius Hill Trudie Hastings Hill, H/w v. Reederei F. Laeisz G.M.B.H., Rostock Schiffarhtsgesellschaft Ms Priwall Mbh & Co. KgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. No. 00-3297Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Moyer v. United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: TE Holdcorp LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API