Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Damé Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1987No. A031745PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
This appeal arises from a dispute between Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and Damé Construction Company, Inc. (Damé) over liability for costs incurred in the relocation of certain electrical power poles. The trial court found Damé responsible for these costs and ordered it to pay PG&E $19,542. We shall affirm the judgment.
Statement of Facts
Damé, a private land development company, owned 417 acres immediately west of and adjacent to San Ramon Valley Boulevard in Contra Costa County. Damé sought approval of a plan to subdivide its land and construct 715 homes. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- County of Contra Costa v. Central Contra Costa Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ne. Sacramento Cty. Sanitation Dist. v. Northridge Park Cty. Water Dist. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Home Builders Ass'n of Greater St. Louis v. St. Louis County Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sundquist Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Classic Community Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.