Legal Opinion

Boroseptic Chemical Co. v. Nelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1928No. File No. 6343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

In this case the record shows no motion for a new trial, and the only error assigned is that the trial court erred in making its conclusions of law and in entering its judgment thereon, for the reason that the findings are insufficient to support the court’s conclusion of law No>. 2. Therefore the only question presented to this court is that presented by such assignment, and we may take the findings of fact as made by the trial court to' be conceded facts relevant to the issues.

The trial court found the facts to be as follows:

On or about May 22, 1918, the defendant, J. B. Nelson,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lincoln Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Barnard v. TidrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bole v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bigelow v. BicekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API