Legal Opinion
Bigelow v. Bicek
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 21, 1938No. Gen. No. 40,219PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
May 29, Í937, plaintiff brought an action against defendant to recover $770 with interest thereon at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from June 15, 1931. Defendant’s motion to strike the complaint was sustained, plaintiff elected to stand by his complaint, the suit was dismissed at his costs, and he appeals.
The complaint alleged that the Insull Utility Investments, Inc., was adjudged a bankrupt in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on September 22, 1932, and that plaintiff was appointed and is now acting as trustee of the estate;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gill Printing Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Marson v. DeitherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Guaranty Mortgage Co. v. WilcoxUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Barnard v. TidrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Stern v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. KraemerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953