Legal Opinion
Blum v. Schlegel
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1993No. 91-CV-633SPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has moved pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to compel the production of documents from the tenure review files of Professor Dianne Avery and other law school faculty, as set forth in ¶¶ 1, 2, and 4(b)-(e) of Plaintiffs interrogatories and document demands dated March 2, 1993. Professor Avery has moved pursuant to Rule 24 to intervene for the limited purpose of protecting her confidentiality interest in the requested documents, *39and has also moved (along with Defendants) for a protective order pursuant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Maria Diaz FARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.