Roseburg Forest Products v. Langley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Division in which the Director concluded that certain medical services provided in 1996 were diagnostic services for a compensable injury suffered by claimant in 1984. Employer contends that the Director did not have jurisdiction over the medical services claim because, in a separate proceeding before the Workers’ Compensation Board, that claim had been accompanied by a claim for compensation for a combined or consequential condition. We conclude that the Director did have jurisdiction over the medical services claim and affirm.
Cla…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mallon v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- SAIF Corp. v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Brooks v. TimberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Counts v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- SAIF Corporation v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Icenhower v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Icenhower v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Saif Corp. v. Carlos-Macias (In re Comp. of Carlos-Macias)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018