Legal Opinion
Paul L. CONTRERAS and Arnoldus Janssen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 12, 2000No. 99-1311PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the amount of annual leave accrued each pay period by certain federal civil servants who work more than a standard eight-hour shift and more than a standard 40-hour workweek. The plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to accrue leave based on the length of their workday, contrary to regulations promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The district court disagreed and upheld the accrual scheme set forth in OPM’s regulations. We affirm.
I
The Annual and Sick Leave Act of 1951, as amended, 5 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6387, defines the rate of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Disabled American Veterans v. GoberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Marian Sears, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- California Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.