Legal Opinion

Conti v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1931No. Appeal 162Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

While not called a “case stated” the parties agreed upon a statement of facts in the case and submitted them to the court below for adjudication without a jury trial, under an agreement that, “If the court shall find that under the facts, the defendant is liable, judgment shall be entered for the amount so found by the court; if the court shall find that under the facts the defendant is not liable, then judgment shall be entered for the defendant. ’ ’ Both parties reserved the right of appeal.

Plaintiff’s right of action ivas based on an accident insurance policy issued by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Trau v. Preferred Accid. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Bertram v. PetrovskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. HiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API