Bertram v. Petrovsky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 177, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co;, Dec. T., 1906, No. 1,513, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in case of Frederick Bertram v. Frank Petrovsky. Replevin for a lot of clothing. Before Staake, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the'case. Error assigned was in taking jurisdiction of the ease and in entering judgment for the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
After the jury had been sworn and testimony had been *428introduced, counsel and court entered into a colloquy with a view to submitting the case to the decision of the court alone. This colloquy was taken down by the official stenographer, whose transcription of the same, approved by the court, was filed and sent up on this appeal as part of the record. As printed in the appellant’s paper-book, it occupies over fifteen pages and consists of some admissions of fact and of such discussion of other questions of fact and law as might be appropriate as a preliminary to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diehl v. IhrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Schuylkill County v. ShoenerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Ford v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Kinsley v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Union Savings Bank v. FifeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frankel v. Reliance Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Hagy v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- East Coast Properties, Inc. v. Harford Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Conti v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Goldfarb v. Colitz Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.