Legal Opinion

Trau v. Preferred Accid. Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1929No. Appeal 134PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The defendant company’s policy insured the plaintiff “ against the effect of bodily injury .......caused solely by external, violent and accidental means.” While it was in force, plaintiff strapped a trunk. As he was pulling the strap tight he felt a sliding or pinching sensation in his left groin, which, a day or two later, he found to have developed into a rupture, requiring an operation.

He brought suit on the policy and recovered a verdict. The court subsequently entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, and the plaintiff appealed.

In Pollock v. U. S.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Atlanta Accident Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Pledger v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. McGlinchey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Arnstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Hoffman v. Rhoads Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API