Trau v. Preferred Accid. Ins. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The defendant company’s policy insured the plaintiff “ against the effect of bodily injury .......caused solely by external, violent and accidental means.” While it was in force, plaintiff strapped a trunk. As he was pulling the strap tight he felt a sliding or pinching sensation in his left groin, which, a day or two later, he found to have developed into a rupture, requiring an operation.
He brought suit on the policy and recovered a verdict. The court subsequently entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, and the plaintiff appealed.
In Pollock v. U. S.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Atlanta Accident Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Pledger v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- McGlinchey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Arnstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Hoffman v. Rhoads Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.