SFM LLC v. Best Roast Coffee
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 SFM LLC, No. CV-19-04820-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Best Roast Coffee LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s motion for alternative service, which requests 16 leave to serve Julia Yim by publication. (Doc. 76). So long as the party seeking to 17 accomplish service by publication complies with the procedures set forth in Arizona Rule 18 of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4.2(f), however, leave of court is unnecessary. See Ruffino v. 19 Lokosky, 425 P.3d 1108, 1110 ¶ 5 n.1…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Roberts v. RobertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Ritchie v. Salvatore Gatto Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010