Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of Lakeside

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2007No. CC 04CV0381; CA A128181; SC S53925PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*72KISTLER, J.

Oregon has provided since statehood that a plaintiff will commence an action on the date that he or she files the complaint as long as the plaintiff also serves the summons on the defendant within 60 days. See ORS 12.020(2) (stating that rule); General Laws of Oregon, Civ Code, ch I, title II, § 15, p 142-43 (Deady 1845-64) (same). The question that this case presents is whether, in amending the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA) in 1981, the legislature intended to exempt OTCA claims from that longstanding rule. The trial court held that it did and dismissed plaintiffs complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Doe v. Lake Oswego School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Powerex Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API