Legal Opinion
Cabri v. Long Island Rail Road
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ. Lewis, Ch. J., and Van Voorhis, J., dissent in the following memorandum. In our view the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the complaint dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law (Wadsworth v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R., 296 N. Y. 206, 212; Crough v. New York Central R. R. Co., 260 N. Y. 227; Schrader v. New York, C. & St. L. R. R. Co., 254 N. Y. 148; Allen v. Erie R. R. Co., 244 N. Y. 542; Avery v. New York, O. & W. Ry.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schrader v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Crough v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Avery v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wadsworth v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Proefrock v. DenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,466 Luis Liriano v. Hobart Corporation, 616 Melrose Meat Corporation,s/h/a Super Associated, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Barnet Shoifet v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Hebbard v. IvesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,466 Luis Liriano v. Hobart Corporation, 616 Melrose Meat Corporation,s/h/a Super Associated, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999