Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,466 Luis Liriano v. Hobart Corporation, 616 Melrose Meat Corporation,s/h/a Super Associated, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 9, 1999No. Docket 96-9641(L), 97-7449(CON)Published
1Opinion of the Court
170 F.3d 264
Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 15,466
Luis LIRIANO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
HOBART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant,
616 Melrose Meat Corporation,s/h/a Super Associated,
Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Docket Nos. 96-9641(L), 97-7449(CON).
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 20, 1997.
Decided March 9, 1999.
Brian J. Isaac, Trolman Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James A. Henderson, Jr., Cornell Law School, Ithaca, NY, for Defendant-Appellant (Steven B. Prystowsky, Saul Wilensky, Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, New York, NY, of counsel to Thompson…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.