Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Hunt
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1965No. 3592PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Judge:
Appellee sued for an absolute divorce on the ground of her husband’s “final conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude.” (Code 1961, § 16^103). She prayed for alimony and also asked that the property rights of the parties in certain real property be adjudicated. The trial court granted the divorce, awarded the wife alimony, and ruled that the wife was entitled to a half-interest in the real properties in issue. The husband has appealed.
The parties were married in 1942. In 1945 the husband purchased a rooming house for $30,000. He met the $5,000 down payment by borrowing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Lundregan v. LundreganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Shelton v. SheltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- Norris v. NorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- McEachnie v. McEachnieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jewell R. Mazique v. Edward C. MaziqueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Hemily v. HemilyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.