Legal Opinion

Swetnam v. Dalby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1938No. 5427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Salt Lake county, refusing on certiorari to annul an order made by one of the judges of the city court of Salt Lake City, setting aside and vacating a default judgment previously rendered by another judge of the court in favor of plaintiff herein and against defendant Florence L. Reeves. Both judges were ex officio justices of the peace of Salt Lake City precinct.

The facts giving rise to the present controversy are as follows: On August 10, 1931, Wilbur Swetnam, plaintiff herein, commenced an action before H. T.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co. v. Consolidated Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  3. Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Canton Provision Co. v. GauderOhio Supreme Court · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Frandsen v. HolladayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API