Legal Opinion

Lust v. Farmers' Bank & Savings Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 19215PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The sole question presented by this record is whether or not this action was appealable.

The solution of the problem whether the case is at law or in equity depends upon the pleadings and the issue tendered, and whether the remedy sought is one in which courts of chancery do and have been accustomed to exercise jurisdiction. To state the matter concisely, we think the question must turn upon the point whether or not the answer sets up such equitable cross-demands and seeks such affirmative relief as to make the case one in equity rather than at law.

It is to be noted that the second defense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. International Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Kiriakis v. FountasOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. W. C. McBride, Inc. v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Logan Gas Co. v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Borton v. EarhartOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Kukla v. GonskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Gowdy v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Norris v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks' Nat'l BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API