Norris v. Brotherhood of Railway Clerks' Nat'l Bank
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, PJ.
This action was therefore one at law, and under §11379 GC, the case was triable to a jury, unless waived. Lust v Farmers’ Bank & Savings Co., 114 Oh St 312, 320, 151 NE 189; Raymond v T., St. L. & K. C. R. Co., 57 Oh St 271, 288, 48 NE 1093; Smith v Anderson, 20 Oh St 76, 81; 15 Ohio Jurisprudence 209, §46.
A jury was not waived, but as appears in the judgment entry the court instructed a verdict for the plaintiff, which was the equivalent of denying the defendants a jury trial. This constituted prejudicial and reversible error. Newnam’s Lessee v City of Cincinnati, 18 Ohio, 323, 333;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murray v. International Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Lust v. Farmers' Bank & Savings Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thornton v. Guckiean Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991