Legal Opinion

State v. Mack

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael A. Gross, J.

In January 2010, this court presided over a jury trial conducted under article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law to determine whether respondent currently has a mental abnormality as defined by Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 (i). On January 13, 2010, the jury returned a verdict that respondent did not have a mental abnormality.

On January 14, 2010, petitioner made an oral application for a motion schedule1 to set aside the jury’s verdict. On February 16, 2010, petitioner filed a motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict arguing it was against the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. JorlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Dutchess County Department of Social Services v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. Shawn X.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Application for an Order to Extend an Order of Conditions Pursuant to CPL 330.20 in Relation to Andrew H., New York County Courts2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API