Roberts v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The appellant points to the provisions of the agreement which declare positively that he is the owner of the full and absolute legal title in and to the property conveyed to him, and that no duty imposed upon him shall affect such title, and to the absence of any provision of the agreement creating an interest in the property in favor of the beneficia*259ries therein named, and contends that no trust was created, and that the covenants by him to make the payments to the beneficiaries were simply contractual obligations undertaken by him as part of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hellman v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cahlan v. Bank of Lassen CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Liberty Nat. Bank v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Reagh v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Christopher v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.