Legal Opinion
Sugar v. CURTIS CIRCULATION COMPANY
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 17, 1974No. 74 Civ. 78PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LASKER, District Judge.
In recent years, the constitutionality of statutes permitting the ex parte prejudgment seizure of property has been increasingly open to question. In this suit, plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief against the enforcement of Article 62 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”) of the State of New York, which permits pre judgment attachment of property without prior notice or a hearing. Plaintiffs claim that CPLR §§ 6201(4), (5) and (8) and 6211 are unconstitutional on their face, because they permit a deprivation of property without due process…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sugar v. Curtis Circulation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft v. BrennanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Vail v. QuinlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- City Partners, Ltd. v. Jamaica Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Vail v. QuinlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.