Legal Opinion
Vail v. Quinlan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1975No. 74 Civ. 4773 (JMC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CANNELLA, District Judge:
This civil rights action, which is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asks that the Court declare unconstitutional and enjoin the enforcement of a panoply of sections contained in Article •19 of the New York Judiciary Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 30 (New York Judiciary Law §§ 756, 757, 765, 767, 769, 770-775) as being in derogation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. It is presently before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to convene a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 and upon the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vail v. QuinlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975