Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1977No. 75-366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue is whether Lillian Onopa, who was the immediate employer of the claimant, was a “contractor under” the appellant Weight Losers within the meaning of sec. 102.06, Stats.

Sec. 102.06, Stats., provides:

“102.06 Joint liability of employer and contractor; loaned employes. An employer shall be liable for compensation to an employe of a contractor or subcontractor under him who is not subject to this chapter, or who has not complied with the conditions of s. 102.28 (2) in any case where such employer would have been liable for compensation if such employe had been working directly for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Consolidated Papers, Inc. v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Deep Rock Oil Co. of Wisconsin v. DerouinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API