Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 10, 1990No. 89-1909Published

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) appeal a circuit court ruling reversing LIRC and holding that Mark Chapman was eligible for worker's compensation benefits. LIRC and DNR argue that the circuit court erred when it held as a matter of law that Chapman, who was injured while cutting timber on DNR property, was performing services for DNR that were integrally related to its functions. In this case, that determination requires DNR to pay worker's compensation benefits to Chapman. We conclude that LIRC's determination was incorrect as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers Local No. 695 v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Motors Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API