Legal Opinion
In Re the Fairview-University Medical Center
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1999No. C3-98-1646, C5-98-1647PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
The Complaint Review Committee, Minnesota Board of Medical Practices challenges the district court’s determination that the statutory peer review privilege, Minn.Stat. § 145.64, protects all documents contained in peer review files from subpoena. We affirm.
FACTS
The Complaint Review Committee (the Committee) is the investigative arm of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practices (the Board), which regulates the use of licenses to practice medicine pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 147.001-22 (1998). In April 1997, in the course of a contested case proceeding before an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Coduti v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Larson v. MontpetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mat-Su Valley Medical Center, LLC v. BolinderAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Itasca County v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority v. ReilingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000