Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 2000No. C8-99-1345PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant Tahsha Patrice Jackson challenges the district court’s termination of her parental rights, alleging that the district court abused its discretion by denying her the right to counsel. Both parties also claim the other’s briefs and appendices contain information that must be stricken because it is not part of the district court record. We reverse, grant appellant’s motion to strike, and deny respondent Ramsey County’s motion to strike.
FACTS
Appellant is the biological mother of G.L.H., born on May 21, 1988, and G.E.H, Jr., born on April 8, 1990. Appellant’s contact…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Matter of Welfare of HGBSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. GaribaldiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007