Legal Opinion
More v. O'neill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1999-3373PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and 60(d)(3). Plaintiff Charles E. Hughes, along with six other plaintiffs, brought individual actions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 631 et seq. against the Secretary of the Department of the Treasury. 1 Plaintiffs alleged that they were discriminated against on the basis of their age with respect to various promotion decisions made by their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Salazar Ex Rel. Salazar v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Thec International-Hamdard Cordova Group-Nazari Constr. Co. v. Cohen Mohr, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kapar v. Islamic Replublic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Austin v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lane v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.