Legal Opinion
61 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1505, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,511 William L. Nesbit v. Pepsico, Inc., Charles A. Selby v. Pepsico, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1993No. 91-16802, 91-16887PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant/appellee Pepsico in two age discrimination cases under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. See Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12900 et seq. Both plaintiffs/appellants William Nesbit and Charles Selby claim that the district court erred by (1) determining that they had not presented a prima facie case of discrimination and (2) refusing to admit certain evidence probative of discrimination. We affirm.
Nesbit and Selby were both employed by New Century Beverage when Pepsico acquired New Century in January,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Stephens v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marsha Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.