Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1988No. A033588PublishedCited by 42 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

Plaintiff William Stephens brought this action against his employer, Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., and Coldwell Banker Real Estate Management Services (collectively referred to as defendant), claiming he was demoted because of his age, in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) A jury found defendant had unlawfully discriminated against plaintiff and awarded plaintiff $325,035. Plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground his motion for attorney fees was denied. We hold that California courts may rely on the federal Age…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mora v. Chem-Tronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1998
  5. Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API