Legal Opinion
Fiedler v. Bowler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 9, 1992No. C 8911-60-CV; CA A68297PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants in an action to collect on a note. ORCP 47B. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Tolbert v. First National Bank, 312 Or 485, 494, 823 P2d 965 (1991). We vacate part of the attorney fees award and otherwise affirm.
On April 26, 1982, plaintiff loaned $75,000 to a partnership comprised of defendants Bowler and Bowen. The loan was secured by four houses in Indiana that the partnership owned. On November 5, 1982, Bowler and Bowen dissolved the partnership. Bowler took title to the houses and agreed with Bowen that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tolbert v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Kilander v. Blickle Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Young v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Avery v. First Resolution Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brent MowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Capital One Bank v. FortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Moore v. Ball, Janik & NovackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Woodroffe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.