Legal Opinion

Woodroffe v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 23, 2018No. A161071PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

*382*23This case was about a number of things when it began but, at this point, it is about a television (TV). Plaintiff, who is incarcerated, obtained a small claims judgment against the state. That judgment-the parties appear to agree-required it to provide him with a new TV "with cables and accessories including box." Although the state gave plaintiff a TV with a box and accessories, the parties dispute whether that TV was new. Plaintiff contends that the TV provided to him was not new but, instead, was banged up and without all of its proper accessories. The state contends that the TV that it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Fiedler v. BowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Evans v. City of WarrentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Verizon Wireless (Vaw), LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Guzek v. FhuereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Yann v. BowserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Funkhouser v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API