Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosa

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1992No. 02932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for possession of a controlled substance1 and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance.2 Appellant raises the following issues on appeal:

1. Whether the Commonwealth violated the Rules of Discovery by failing to furnish the defense with mandatory discovery until the trial date?

2. Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it refused to grant the defense a continuance to prepare for trial after receiving discovery on the day of trial?

3. Whether prior counsel was ineffective for failing to file and argue post…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Com. v. Hollins, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. Dunn, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Commonwealth v. Dunn, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Commonwealth v. Dunn, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API