Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 25, 2004No. 25883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

This cross-appeal arises from an action brought by homeowners Bert and Stephanie Atkinson (Atkinsons) against Or-kin Exterminating Company (Orkin), seeking recovery for structural damage to their home caused by termite infestation. In this appeal, Orkin seeks a remittitur of the punitive damages award, and the Atkinsons seek reversal of the trial court’s decision to offset their compensatory damages by the amount they received in a settlement from a third party. 1 After certifying this case from the court of appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, we reverse and remand the issue concerning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Mitchell, Jr. v. Fortis Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. James v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API