Legal Opinion

Milling v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1912No. 1541PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

—The appellant was indicted and convicted for unlawfully practicing medicine; his penalty was fixed at $50 fine and twenty minutes in jail.

The indictment in substance and in effect alleges that on or about November 10, 1910, appellant, who was then a resident of Stephens County, Texas, did practice in said county upon human beings without authority of law.in that he did unlawfully treat a physical disease and disorder of R. L. McFall and charged him indirectly therefor $2, said treatment being given in the capacity of a physician or doctor, or both, under a system of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Singh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Ex Parte CollinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Germany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HalstedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Deen v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Coker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API