State v. Stansbury
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Chief Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Sean Stansbury’s motion to suppress the results of an aleo-sensor test and subsequent field sobriety tests. The trial court found that the officers did not have a reasonable, articulable suspicion to detain Stansbury and administer the aleo-sensor test. We disagree and reverse.
The facts in this case are undisputed. Two Cobb County police officers on routine patrol were driving behind Stansbury’s car when they noticed his license tag was expired. The officers pulled Stansbury over, and one officer went up to the man…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- State v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. KwiatkowskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.